Tag Archives: health

When fat attacks! And how to win the battle.

My Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week is about fat. It turns out that fat is far more than just a place to store extra calories. Fat has metabolic and physiological effects that can promote disease, including diabetes and heart disease. And that is how your fat can attack you.

But regular exercise can offset or reverse many of the negative effects of excess fat. This is why people who are “fat but fit” may fare better than people who have a normal body weight, but don’t exercise.

If you want to learn more about the role of adipose tissue on health, these are two articles are a good place to start (fair warning–they are high-sci):

George Ntaios, Nikolaos K. Gatselis, Konstantinos Makaritsis, George N. Dalekos. Adipokines as mediators of endothelial function and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2013;227(2): 216-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.12.029

Coelho M, Oliveira T, Fernandes R. Biochemistry of adipose tissue: an endocrine organ. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(2):191-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33181

Are food additives safe? The answer is…no one really knows!

My Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week is about the safety of food additives. It was inspired by a recent article and editorial in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

Neltner TG, Alger HM, O’Reilly JT, Krimsky S, Bero LA, Maffini MV. Conflicts of Interest in Approvals of Additives to Food Determined to Be Generally Recognized as Safe: Out of Balance. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;():-. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10559.
Nestle M. Conflicts of Interest in the Regulation of Food Safety: A Threat to Scientific Integrity. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;():-. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9158. http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1725122

Basically, many commonly used food additives have not undergone adequate testing for safety and approval by the FDA, mostly because everyone (literally, everyone) who serves on the panels that approve these additives as GRAS (generally recognized as safe) is either directly or indirectly paid by the additive manufacturers. And that just ain’t right!

If you are interested in food additives and other aspects of food safety, nutrition, and health, here are two excellent resources:

The Center for Science in the Public Interest report on food additive safety : http://www.cspinet.com/reports/chemcuisine.htm

Marion Nestle, the author of the editorial mentioned above, has an excellent blog about all aspects of nutrition, including food additives and safety:  http://www.foodpolitics.com/

Just in time for Childhood Obesity Awareness Month: The completely unauthorized and ill-advised childhood obesity experiment

September is Childhood Obesity Awareness Month, which is the topic of my Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard today.

Although the causes involve a complex interaction of genetic, biological, behavioral, and environmental factors (as this article explains), most cases likely involve too little activity and too much energy intake, particularly added sugars. It is important to note that both diet and activity play a role, and both a targets for prevention and treatment. The same is true for adults, too.

Obesity among children, both young kids and teenagers, is associated with serious health, social, and psychological problems. In fact, obese children, especially those who are inactive, tend to develop “adult” diseases including high blood pressure and diabetes.

And while we know that obesity and inactivity in kids is a problem, I don’t think we realize how bad it is now or will be in the future. That’s because no one has any idea what will happen to an obese 12-year old who develops type 2 diabetes. Adults who become diabetic are at higher risk for an early heart attack; does this mean that a 12-year old will be on the fast track  toward a heart attack at age 30?

We don’t know. But I think we are going to find out. Unfortunately, it’s as though we are experimenting with a generation of children to find out.

 

Why BMI matters–Commentary from my soapbox.

My Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week is about body mass index (BMI), the most commonly used measure of body fatness and health. It was prompted by a recent article in the journal Science that raised familiar questions about whether or not BMI is a valid indicator of obesity and health.

This lead to reports in the popular media about BMI, like this one in Time magazine, the tone of which suggests that doctors and researchers who use BMI don’t know what they are doing. Since I use BMI in research and in practice, I  felt I should address both the article and share some other important points and additional thoughts about BMI.

1. BMI is so widely used because it is simple to measure – it only requires knowing height and weight – and because it is a good indicator of body weight and health risks. That said, it’s not perfect (see below). You can calculate your BMI here.

2. One of the biggest criticisms of BMI is that it can’t distinguish between fat and non-fat tissue, meaning that a person could have a high BMI but not be overly fat. The elevated BMI could be due to excess muscle, as is common in athletes. This is true: BMI doesn’t differentiate between muscle and fat. In fact, it isn’t even a measure of body fat. But in most cases, people who have a high BMI do have a high percent fat.

Don’t believe me? Then try what I call he Wal-Mart test. Go to Wal-Mart someday and measure the BMI and percent fat of everyone who comes through the door. What you will no doubt find is that the majority of the people who have a high BMI are overfat and relatively few have a high BMI due to excess muscle. This is why BMI works so well on a population level.

3. Even though BMI may misclassify some people as overfat when they aren’t, there is a simple way to avoid this: measure their waist circumference. People who have a high BMI due to excess muscle will have a narrow waist (think body builders) and those who are overfat will have a high waist circumference (think Homer Simpson). The point is that it is easy not to misclassify someone if they are in front of you.

4. Another criticism is that it is possible to have a normal BMI but have a high percent fat. This is something that we have seen in our lab and it almost always occurs in people who are thin but unfit–they don’t exercise.  The problem is that a normal BMI indicates good health, but if a person has a lot of fat they really aren’t very healthy.

This is also a valid criticism. And it is especially true if the excess fat is visceral fat, which is stored deep in the abdomen and is associated with higher risks of diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease. But there are other indicators of health risk beyond body fatness, including blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood cholesterol. BMI should be used in conjunction with these other factors to assess overall health.

5. Research also suggests that being overweight or obese according to BMI isn’t necessarily unhealthy and that having a normal BMI isn’t always better. But that is only part of the story. The part that gets left out is physical fitness. It’s true…research shows that the risk of death is lower among people who are overweight or obese but have a high level of physical fitness compared to normal weight individuals who are unfit.

This suggests that regular exercise (to become and stay fit) is at least as important as body weight in determining the risk of death. No question this is true!

However, this doesn’t mean that people who are “fit and fat” are necessarily healthier. The research shows a lower risk of death during a specific follow-up period, but doesn’t make claims about the health during that time. It is possible, even likely, that obesity is associated with some impairment of health—back pain, for example—that normal weight subjects might not experience. Exercise can reduce those problems, but there are likely still some reasons why losing some weight might benefit even those obese individuals who are fit.

Furthermore, I wonder how many obese people are fit enough to have a lower risk of death. I suspect that number is low. Maybe we should add a fitness test to the Wal-Mart test to find out.

6. These problems aren’t a failing of BMI itself, it is the fact that BMI isn’t meant to be used alone. BMI is just one measure of health. When used in combination with others, like waist circumference and physical fitness, BMI is a much better predictor of current and future health problems.

Using BMI alone and complaining that it doesn’t accurately assess health is inappropriate.  Your doctor wouldn’t measure just your blood pressure, find hat it is normal, and proclaim you healthy, right? The same is true for BMI.

With that said, I will step off my soapbox. At least for now.

In vitro beef and other fake food.

My Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week is about the in vitro burger you no doubt heard about in the news. Would you eat meat that was created in a laboratory? Many people would say no, mostly because it seems “unnatural.”

But most of us eat plenty of processed and modified foods every day. Aren’t these foods also unnatural?

You can learn more about the story behind the creation as well as results of the first taste test of the “test tube” burger at the following links:

A good New York Times story about the taste test here.

An article in Scientific American here:

If you are looking for something to listen to while you exercise, try this radio story on Science Friday on NPR.

Another New York Times story about the creation of the burger is here.

Your schedule for staying active at work, from Lifehacker (and me).

The negative health effects of sitting all day at work are well established, and incorporating activity into your day isn’t as difficult as it might seem. But it is easy to get busy and forget to take even a few minutes to be active.

Problem solved! The good people at Lifehacker have come up with a schedule to help you remember to stretch and strengthen throughout the day at work. And I got to help!

The Health and Fitness guide to surviving a zombie apocalypse.

So, my Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week is about zombies. More specifically, how a healthy diet and regular exercise can improve your chances of escaping a zombie invasion. Which is something that some people worry about.

If you aren’t worried about a zombie apocalypse you might be after seeing the movie World War Z, which opens this week.

Oddly, this isn’t the first time that I have managed to link nutrition and fitness with zombies.

Weight loss reduces physical limitations and improves physical function.

Last week I presented a study at the American College of Sports Medicine Annual Meeting in Indianapolis showing that weight loss can improve physical function and reduce physical limitations. This study was also the topic of my Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week.

In this study 48 subjects followed a low-calorie diet (~1200 calories/day) and participated in daily exercise (progressing to 60 minutes per day of walking). The diet and exercise programs resulted in significant weight loss, about 13 pounds on average, or over 1.5 pounds per week.

We assessed physical function using a simple physical test called the timed get-up and go test (TGUG), in which the time required to rise from a chair, walk 10 feet, and return to the chair was measured. The subjects also completed the physical functioning domain of the Short-Form 36 Health Status Survey (SF-36), a subjective reporting of health-related quality of life.

Following weight loss the TGUG time was lower, meaning the subjects were able to complete the test more quickly. The SF-36 Physical Function score was  higher. Together, these tests indicate that the subjects were experiencing improved physical function and fewer limitations to normal activities

This is important because physical limitations can have a big impact of quality of life. Being overweight makes simple physical tasks, such as bending over and tying your shoes, challenging. Losing weight can make these things easier, improving quality of life.

This is consistent with what many people who have lost weight report: “I feel so much better now than I did when I was heavy,” or “I didn’t realize how difficult things were for me.”

Sometimes, it’s the little things that count the most!

 

It’s not just for kids: Adults need recess, too.

The childhood obesity epidemic is usually blamed, in part, on the fact that most kids aren’t active enough at home and at school. Opportunities for activity in school are less common now because programs like physical education and recess are being cut in an effort to save money or to dedicate time for test preparation. This has an effect not only on health but on academic performance, since regular activity improves attention, memory, and learning (in addition to the health benefits).

Parents are partly to blame, too. There are plenty of missed opportunities for physical activity outside of school. Since most adults don’t get enough activity, it is no surprise that they aren’t encouraging their kids to be active.

Adults get the same benefits from regular physical activity as children do. Just as kids who are active during the  day perform better at school, adults who are active at work are more productive. But most people spend much of their work day sitting with little to no activity. This is bad for health and for job performance.

So why don’t adults get recess, too? They should!

This is the topic of my Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week. It is also the mission behind an initiative called Instant Recess, which provides tools to help people include short activity breaks into their day. Far from being a burden or a waste of time, these short bouts of activity improve health, mental wellbeing, and productivity.

Missed opportunities to promote physical activity for kids.

Most kids don’t get enough physical activity. No surprise that inactivity is associated with health conditions like obesity, high blood pressure, and diabetes. But a lack of activity in children can lead to poor academic performance, too.

But we are missing good opportunities to provide kids with chances to be physically active at home and in school. This is the topic of my Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard today.

Schools are a perfect place to include opportunities to be active. Unfortunately, opportunities for activity, from PE to recess, are among the first cuts to be made when budgets are tight. Why isn’t promoting an active, healthy lifestyle  just as important as promoting math or reading or science?

A common argument is that parents should teach their children about a healthy lifestyle, not schools. I disagree. At some point, we (society) decided that parents shouldn’t have to teach their kids math or reading or science. I don’t know the exact rationale, but it likely had something to do with the fact that most parents don’t have the knowledge or skills to teach these essential subjects. Why should activity and, while we are at it, nutrition, be any different?

In fact, we have been experimenting with removing  physical activity and nutrition education from schools and leaving it to parents for some time now. Given the childhood (and adult) obesity epidemic, it hasn’t gone well. Maybe it is time to revisit providing quality health, activity, and nutrition education in schools.

If you want to learn more about benefits of and ways to promote physical activity for kids the Physical Guidelines for Americans is a good place to start. In particular, the Midcourse Report offers recommendations and solutions regarding physical activity in children.