Is exercise safe? Yes!

Recently someone asked me why I recommend that people exercise considering that exercise is  dangerous and can lead to injury or death (they didn’t say it exactly that way, though). I responded that while it is true that exercise could be dangerous, it almost always isn’t and serious complications exceptionally rare. Furthermore, regular exercise actually reduces the risk of heart attack or sudden death and screening prior to starting an exercise program can reduce this risk further.

Then, someone asked me about the “CrossFit syndrome” they saw on the news. At first I had no idea what they were talking about, but in our conversation I figured out that it referred to exertional rhabdomyolysis. This form of severe muscle damage can, rarely, result from extreme exercise and, apparently, this has happened  in people doing CrossFit.

But it could result from any overexertion, not just CrossFit and not just exercise. The risk of injury like this can be reduced by starting at a low intensity, progressing gradually, and taking advice from qualified, certified trainers and coaches. Some common sense helps, too: Exercise may cause some muscle soreness, but it shouldn’t hurt.

So, I figured I should write about exercise safety, which I did in my Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week.

Friday afternoon seems like a perfect time for a movie. A Food MythBusters movie, of course!

You really should see this great video from Food Myth Busters about the advertising of fast food and “junk” food to kids. It is an excellent look at the consequences of food marketing to children, including the many forms this marketing can take.

I think that the message that parents (among others, like school administrators) need to take responsibility for limiting children’s exposure to these marketing efforts and –more importantly — set a good example is important.

It’s only about 6 minutes long, so you will have plenty of time to check out the excellent information on the rest of the site.

In case you were expecting some thing from the other MythBusters, they have videos about food, too.

When fat attacks! And how to win the battle.

My Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week is about fat. It turns out that fat is far more than just a place to store extra calories. Fat has metabolic and physiological effects that can promote disease, including diabetes and heart disease. And that is how your fat can attack you.

But regular exercise can offset or reverse many of the negative effects of excess fat. This is why people who are “fat but fit” may fare better than people who have a normal body weight, but don’t exercise.

If you want to learn more about the role of adipose tissue on health, these are two articles are a good place to start (fair warning–they are high-sci):

George Ntaios, Nikolaos K. Gatselis, Konstantinos Makaritsis, George N. Dalekos. Adipokines as mediators of endothelial function and atherosclerosis. Atherosclerosis 2013;227(2): 216-221. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2012.12.029

Coelho M, Oliveira T, Fernandes R. Biochemistry of adipose tissue: an endocrine organ. Arch Med Sci. 2013;9(2):191-200. http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2013.33181

On the topic of food additives: Why there is seaweed in your ice cream.

Since I have been writing about food additives this week, this article caught my attention when I saw it.

Why Seaweed is Sometimes Used in the Making of Ice Cream.

I am continually impressed by what I can learn through randomly clinking links on the web. I could probably spend and entire day just doing that. [Leading to a feeling of panic upon realizing that is it already almost 11:30 am!]

Are food additives safe? The answer is…no one really knows!

My Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week is about the safety of food additives. It was inspired by a recent article and editorial in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.

Neltner TG, Alger HM, O’Reilly JT, Krimsky S, Bero LA, Maffini MV. Conflicts of Interest in Approvals of Additives to Food Determined to Be Generally Recognized as Safe: Out of Balance. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;():-. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.10559.
Nestle M. Conflicts of Interest in the Regulation of Food Safety: A Threat to Scientific Integrity. JAMA Intern Med. 2013;():-. doi:10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.9158. http://archinte.jamanetwork.com/article.aspx?articleid=1725122

Basically, many commonly used food additives have not undergone adequate testing for safety and approval by the FDA, mostly because everyone (literally, everyone) who serves on the panels that approve these additives as GRAS (generally recognized as safe) is either directly or indirectly paid by the additive manufacturers. And that just ain’t right!

If you are interested in food additives and other aspects of food safety, nutrition, and health, here are two excellent resources:

The Center for Science in the Public Interest report on food additive safety : http://www.cspinet.com/reports/chemcuisine.htm

Marion Nestle, the author of the editorial mentioned above, has an excellent blog about all aspects of nutrition, including food additives and safety:  http://www.foodpolitics.com/

Just in time for Childhood Obesity Awareness Month: The completely unauthorized and ill-advised childhood obesity experiment

September is Childhood Obesity Awareness Month, which is the topic of my Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard today.

Although the causes involve a complex interaction of genetic, biological, behavioral, and environmental factors (as this article explains), most cases likely involve too little activity and too much energy intake, particularly added sugars. It is important to note that both diet and activity play a role, and both a targets for prevention and treatment. The same is true for adults, too.

Obesity among children, both young kids and teenagers, is associated with serious health, social, and psychological problems. In fact, obese children, especially those who are inactive, tend to develop “adult” diseases including high blood pressure and diabetes.

And while we know that obesity and inactivity in kids is a problem, I don’t think we realize how bad it is now or will be in the future. That’s because no one has any idea what will happen to an obese 12-year old who develops type 2 diabetes. Adults who become diabetic are at higher risk for an early heart attack; does this mean that a 12-year old will be on the fast track  toward a heart attack at age 30?

We don’t know. But I think we are going to find out. Unfortunately, it’s as though we are experimenting with a generation of children to find out.

 

My Friend Shannon update: The problem with her new pants (but in a good way)

I haven’t given an update for some time, but My Friend Shannon is still going strong on her remodeling project.
I received an email from her recently with the intriguing subject, “Women’s clothes are liars!”  I thought it was worth sharing:
I have a hard time finding jeans that fit me properly.  A few years ago, I discovered that Old Navy jeans are the best fit for my body.  They have 3 different styles, The Sweetheart, The Flirt, The Diva.  The Flirt fit me the best because it was a low waist, fuller thigh, straight leg.  Hate the name, love the fit.  
At the time I think I was a size 10 in most all pants.  But, of course, in Old Navy jeans, I was a size 8.  What really made me mad was that I knew they did it on purpose so women would feel good about being a “smaller size” in their jeans and would keep buying jeans from them.  But even knowing that, I still felt good about being in a size 8.  UGH!
Fast forward to present day.  I went shopping on Labor Day to get some new jeans since my old ones are too big now (Yay!).  I now wear a size 2 Diva.  Divas are narrower in the hips than The Flirts.
Have I lost weight? Yes.  Do I really think I’ve lost enough weight to go from a size 8 Flirt with roomier hip to a size 2 Diva with a narrower hip? Of course not! Women’s clothes lie!!!   But I still felt good so I apparently don’t care if they lie to me as long as they tell me what I want to hear.
Despite appearances to the contrary, this is not a conspiracy on the part of Old Navy to deceive customers into thinking they are a smaller size than they really are. It is actually a conspiracy on the part of most women’s clothing manufacturers to deceive customers into thinking they are a smaller size than they really are. It is called “vanity sizing.” But what seems like a harmless marketing ploy may actually be contributing to weight gain and obesity.
[Proof that vanity sizing has gotten out of control: Some women’s clothing comes in a size 0 or 00. What’s next, negative sizes?]
Imagine that Shannon wears a size 6 jeans. The changes in sizing mean that she could actually gain weight, requiring a larger size (say, an 8). But when she goes to buy new jeans she finds that the old size 8 is now called size 6. Of course Shannon is thrilled that she still wears the same size jeans and her fears of gaining weight were unfounded! In this case, Shannon has lost an important cue—needing to buy larger jeans—that she has gained weight. And missing cues like these allow people to gain weight over time without noticing it.
It could be worse. Some pants can make you fat! Many men’s pants include an expandable waist that allow up to 2 inches (or more, in some cases) of  “stretch.” It is possible that a man could gain several inches around his waist but still wear the same pants size.

Why BMI matters–Commentary from my soapbox.

My Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week is about body mass index (BMI), the most commonly used measure of body fatness and health. It was prompted by a recent article in the journal Science that raised familiar questions about whether or not BMI is a valid indicator of obesity and health.

This lead to reports in the popular media about BMI, like this one in Time magazine, the tone of which suggests that doctors and researchers who use BMI don’t know what they are doing. Since I use BMI in research and in practice, I  felt I should address both the article and share some other important points and additional thoughts about BMI.

1. BMI is so widely used because it is simple to measure – it only requires knowing height and weight – and because it is a good indicator of body weight and health risks. That said, it’s not perfect (see below). You can calculate your BMI here.

2. One of the biggest criticisms of BMI is that it can’t distinguish between fat and non-fat tissue, meaning that a person could have a high BMI but not be overly fat. The elevated BMI could be due to excess muscle, as is common in athletes. This is true: BMI doesn’t differentiate between muscle and fat. In fact, it isn’t even a measure of body fat. But in most cases, people who have a high BMI do have a high percent fat.

Don’t believe me? Then try what I call he Wal-Mart test. Go to Wal-Mart someday and measure the BMI and percent fat of everyone who comes through the door. What you will no doubt find is that the majority of the people who have a high BMI are overfat and relatively few have a high BMI due to excess muscle. This is why BMI works so well on a population level.

3. Even though BMI may misclassify some people as overfat when they aren’t, there is a simple way to avoid this: measure their waist circumference. People who have a high BMI due to excess muscle will have a narrow waist (think body builders) and those who are overfat will have a high waist circumference (think Homer Simpson). The point is that it is easy not to misclassify someone if they are in front of you.

4. Another criticism is that it is possible to have a normal BMI but have a high percent fat. This is something that we have seen in our lab and it almost always occurs in people who are thin but unfit–they don’t exercise.  The problem is that a normal BMI indicates good health, but if a person has a lot of fat they really aren’t very healthy.

This is also a valid criticism. And it is especially true if the excess fat is visceral fat, which is stored deep in the abdomen and is associated with higher risks of diabetes, hypertension, and heart disease. But there are other indicators of health risk beyond body fatness, including blood pressure, blood glucose, and blood cholesterol. BMI should be used in conjunction with these other factors to assess overall health.

5. Research also suggests that being overweight or obese according to BMI isn’t necessarily unhealthy and that having a normal BMI isn’t always better. But that is only part of the story. The part that gets left out is physical fitness. It’s true…research shows that the risk of death is lower among people who are overweight or obese but have a high level of physical fitness compared to normal weight individuals who are unfit.

This suggests that regular exercise (to become and stay fit) is at least as important as body weight in determining the risk of death. No question this is true!

However, this doesn’t mean that people who are “fit and fat” are necessarily healthier. The research shows a lower risk of death during a specific follow-up period, but doesn’t make claims about the health during that time. It is possible, even likely, that obesity is associated with some impairment of health—back pain, for example—that normal weight subjects might not experience. Exercise can reduce those problems, but there are likely still some reasons why losing some weight might benefit even those obese individuals who are fit.

Furthermore, I wonder how many obese people are fit enough to have a lower risk of death. I suspect that number is low. Maybe we should add a fitness test to the Wal-Mart test to find out.

6. These problems aren’t a failing of BMI itself, it is the fact that BMI isn’t meant to be used alone. BMI is just one measure of health. When used in combination with others, like waist circumference and physical fitness, BMI is a much better predictor of current and future health problems.

Using BMI alone and complaining that it doesn’t accurately assess health is inappropriate.  Your doctor wouldn’t measure just your blood pressure, find hat it is normal, and proclaim you healthy, right? The same is true for BMI.

With that said, I will step off my soapbox. At least for now.

Good advice for college students. And everyone else.

This came to my attention recently. It’s an infographic about how college students can stay active, get fit, and avoid the dreaded “Freshman 15.”

This is good advice for the rest of us, too. Replace dorm room with living room and cafeteria with kitchen and you have a simple and effective way to improve your health.

The Best Regimen for College Fitness

[The Best Regimen for College Fitness via The Best Colleges]

By the way, studies of weight gain during college show that it isn’t really the Freshman 15. Research shows it’s more like the Freshman 4.6. But that doesn’t have the same impact, does it?

Why your diet may not be working as well as you hoped (and how to fix it).

Many people follow a diet to lose weight, treat health conditions such as high blood pressure, high cholesterol, or diabetes, or to feel “healthier.” Some of these diets are based on research (the DASH diet, Mediterranean diet, etc.) and others are simply trendy at the moment (the Paleo diet).

There is great debate about which diet is the best. Unfortunately, there are no good answers to that question. The good news is that almost all diets are good,  meaning that they are at least partially effective for improving some health measure. People do lose weight following even the most ridiculous diets, right?

It turns out that the diet is only one part of an effective strategy for weight loss or lowering blood pressure, cholesterol, or glucose. The other essential factor is  physical activity!

Regular exercise, or pretty much any activity, is important for several reasons. For a person trying to lose weight, exercise adds to weight loss and helps keep the weight off later. Nutritional interventions for diabetes, osteoporosis, high blood pressure, and high cholesterol are all more effective with exercise.

The idea that a diet is more effective when combined with exercise is the topic of my Health & Fitness column in the Aiken Standard this week.